By Tresckow
The “Separate, but Equal” decision of 1896
Oh the drugs they had in the 19th century!
Ok, this certainly isn’t when United States judiciary dumassary began, but I’d like to think this is where it got its momentum. “Separate, but equal?” Get the hell out of here! Did these people actually listen to the words coming out of their mouths? Yes, I did take that from Chris Tucker. But he wasn't using it at the time.
This is the exact moment when our illustrious elite Supreme Court decided that a portion of the US population was just as equal as another segment without actually being part of the whole or having the rights of equal education or the right to vote or the right of free speech or the right to a fair trial…. Wow. This sounds like a little slice of heaven. Way to put your feet in the wet cement that would become the tumultuous 1960’s. Bravo old white guys!
Whatever drugs the justices on the Supreme Court were on, I need to partake. Any narcotic that truly makes you believe you can have two segments of the population be completely separated from each other, but contain the same amount of equal rights makes heroin look sooo yesterday.
A black person (no, I’m not using the politically correct term. That’s just ridiculous) is just as equal as whitey until he tries to use a white’s only crapper. If this was true equality all men and women every color and nationality must have the right to take a dump in any restroom they feel like. Well, we have to still segregate by gender. Men can’t lift the toilet seat at home. What makes you think we’re going to do it in a public place?
No comments:
Post a Comment